How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Iconia A14 vs Pad 8

Acer Iconia A14 vs Xiaomi Pad 8

What Iconia A14 does better (4) and where Pad 8 wins (18) — every spec side by side.

Acer Iconia A14
Acer · 2025Iconia A14
6.4Score
4 advantages≈ $280
vs
Xiaomi Pad 8
Xiaomi · 2025Pad 8
8.5Score
18 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
5.4Display8.6
5.4Performance8.7
6.1Battery7.6
7.6Memory & storage6.7
4.1Features7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Iconia A14Pad 8
211 × 324.68173.4 × 251.25.8
Iconia A14Pad 8Difference
Height324.6 mm251.2 mm+73.4 mm
Width211 mm173.4 mm+37.6 mm
Thickness8 mm5.8 mm+2.2 mm
Weight910 g485 g+425 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Iconia A14 better than Pad 8?

  1. Screen size14″ vs 11.2″+25%
  2. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  3. Memory card slotYes · Pad 8: No
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Pad 8: No

Why is Pad 8 better than Iconia A14?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
  2. Pixel density162 ppi vs 344 ppi2.1×
  3. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  4. Peak brightness400 nits vs 800 nits2×
  5. Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 9,200 mAh+15%
  6. Weight910 g vs 485 g+88%
  7. CPU frequency2 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+60%
  8. Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
  9. Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
  10. Max video1080p vs 4K
  11. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
  12. Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 2,136 px+78%
Specifications

Side by side

Acer Iconia A14Acer Iconia A14≈ $2806.4
Xiaomi Pad 8Xiaomi Pad 8≈ $2808.5
Design
Weight910 g485 g
Thickness8 mm5.8 mm
Height324.6 mm251.2 mm
Width211 mm173.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
Back—Aluminium
ColoursVapor SilverBlack, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size14″11.2″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px2,136 px
Resolution (long side)1,920 px3,200 px
Pixel density162 ppi344 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness400 nits800 nits
Screen-to-body ratio83%85.8%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetAllwinner A733Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Chip maker—Qualcomm
Process12 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2 GHz3.21 GHz
GPUIMG BXM-4-64 MC01Adreno 825
AnTuTu score—2,296,077
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,769
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,000 mAh9,200 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Wired charging30 W45 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)—Yes
NFCNoNo
GPSNoNo
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera8 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2.2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p4K
4K video frame rate—30 fps
Front camera5 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 3
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare