Why is Iconia A16 A16-11 better than MagicPad 4?
- Screen size16″ vs 12.3″+30%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx1 vs IPx0
- Repairability classB vs C
Why is MagicPad 4 better than Iconia A16 A16-11?
- Weight980 g vs 450 g2.2×
- Endurance per cycle43 h vs 90 h2.1×
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,6002×
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 980 g | 450 g |
| Height | 9 mm | 5 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP41 | IP40 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx1 | IPx0 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 12.3″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Pixel density | — | 290 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 2,400 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Chip maker | Allwinner | Qualcomm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | 43 h | 90 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
