vs
4.4Memory & storage4.1
Why is Iconia A16 A16-21 better than Pad X9 Max?
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 13″+23%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx0
Why is Pad X9 Max better than Iconia A16 A16-21?
- Weight1,290 g vs 618 g2.1×
- Endurance per cycle25 h vs 146 h5.8×
- Energy classG vs E
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,6002×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1,290 g | 618 g |
| Thickness | — | 6.8 mm |
| Height | 9 mm | 7 mm |
| Width | — | 192.7 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP40 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx0 |
| Colours | — | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 13″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 1,560 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 2,500 px |
| Pixel density | — | 228 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 700 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 85.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek MT | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 10,100 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 16 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | MagicOS 10 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | E |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | 25 h | 146 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
