vs
2.7Memory & storage4.6
Why is Iconia Tab A11-21 better than U12?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx0
- Weight500 g vs 567 g+13%
Why is U12 better than Iconia Tab A11-21?
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Screen size10.9″ vs 12″+10%
- Repairability classC vs B
- Endurance per cycle52 h vs 91 h+75%
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 500 g | 567 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 9 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | — | 177.7 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP20 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx0 |
| Colours | — | Aquamarine Blue, Misty Gray, Obsidian Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.9″ | 12″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | — | 194 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 81.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Allwinner | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 9,000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 16 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | 91 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
