vs
8.0Memory & storage8.8
Why is Iconia V13-11 better than MatePad 12X 2025?
- Screen size13″ vs 12″+8%
- Energy classF vs G
- Repairability classB vs C
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is MatePad 12X 2025 better than Iconia V13-11?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Weight680 g vs 555 g+23%
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
- Endurance per cycle82 h vs 94 h+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 680 g | 555 g |
| Height | 8 mm | 6 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx2 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 12″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Pixel density | — | 280 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek MT | HiSilicon Kirin |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | HiSilicon |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | F | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 82 h | 94 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
