vs
5.2Memory & storage4.4
Why is iPlay 70 Max Pro better than HANNSpad SN14TP7B?
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Endurance per cycle145 h vs 48 h3×
- Weight684 g vs 900 g+32%
- Energy classE vs G
- Drop resistance classC vs D
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 900+11%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is HANNSpad SN14TP7B better than iPlay 70 Max Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx52.5×
- Screen size13″ vs 14.1″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 684 g | 900 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | — |
| Height | 7 mm | 10 mm |
| Width | 193.4 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP45 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx5 |
| Colours | Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 14.1″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | — |
| Pixel density | 232 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 350 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | MediaTek MT |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 900 |
| Endurance per cycle | 145 h | 48 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | C | D |
Related comparisons
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
vs
Doogee U13 ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
7.87.3
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming TabletvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
7.57.3
vs
Honor Pad X9 MaxvsHANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7B
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsXoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsDoogee U13 Pro