vs
6.0Display6.8
7.7Battery4.3
5.2Memory & storage5.2
Why is iPlay 70 Max Pro better than Moto Pad (2026)?
- Battery capacity10,000 mAh vs 7,040 mAh+42%
- Wired charging33 W vs 20 W+65%
- Screen size13″ vs 11″+18%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 82.9%+2%
Why is Moto Pad (2026) better than iPlay 70 Max Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Cellular (LTE)No · iPlay 70 Max Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness350 nits vs 500 nits+43%
- Weight684 g vs 480 g+43%
- Pixel density232 ppi vs 274 ppi+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 684 g | 480 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 7 mm |
| Height | 7 mm | 254.6 mm |
| Width | 193.4 mm | 166.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Gray | Pantone Bronze Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 232 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 350 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 392 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 82.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 527,271 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,981 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 7,040 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 20 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | — | No |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | — | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 145 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
vs
AlldoCube iPlay 70 Max ProvsAcer Iconia A16 A16-21
vs
Doogee U13 ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
7.87.3
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming TabletvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
7.67.3
vs
AlldoCube iPlay 70 Max ProvsTecno Megapad 2
7.36.9
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
5.86.1