Why is Ultra Pad better than T60?
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 350 nits+71%
- Screen size13″ vs 12.2″+6%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 236 ppi+12%
- Battery charge cycles1,100 vs 800+38%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is T60 better than Ultra Pad?
- Endurance per cycle75 h vs 156 h2.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- Energy classF vs D
- Drop resistance classE vs B
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 640 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | — |
| Height | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 191.1 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 12.2″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,880 px | — |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 236 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.1% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 15,000 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | F | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 75 h | 156 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | B |
