vs
3.0Display2.4
2.0Performance3.4
2.2Battery2.4
2.0Memory & storage2.2
2.0Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Viva 1003G LiteMatePad T8
| Viva 1003G Lite | MatePad T8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 246.2 mm | 199.7 mm | +46.5 mm |
| Width | 171.7 mm | 121.1 mm | +50.6 mm |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 8.6 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 505 g | 310 g | +195 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Viva 1003G Lite better than MatePad T8?
- Screen size10.1″ vs 8″+26%
Why is MatePad T8 better than Viva 1003G Lite?
- RAM1 GB vs 3 GB3×
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+27%
- Storage (max)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Cellular (LTE)No · Viva 1003G Lite: Yes
- Weight505 g vs 310 g+63%
- CPU frequency1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz+54%
- Rear camera0.3 MP vs 5 MP16.7×
- Pixel density149 ppi vs 189 ppi+27%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- CPU cores4 vs 82×
- Max video720p vs 1080p
- Bluetooth4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 505 g | 310 g |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 246.2 mm | 199.7 mm |
| Width | 171.7 mm | 121.1 mm |
| Colours | Black | Deepsea Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 149 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70% | 76.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8321A | Mediatek MT8768 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 28 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-400 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage (max) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5 |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 0.3 MP | 5 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 720p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | EMUI 10 |
Related comparisons
vs
Allview Viva 1003G LitevsAmazon Fire HD 8 Plus (2020)
3.64.0
vs
alcatel 3T 10vsAllview Viva 1003G Lite
3.63.6
vs
alcatel Smart Tab 7vsAllview Viva 1003G Lite
3.53.6
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020)vsHuawei MatePad T8
3.93.8
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus (2020)vsHuawei MatePad T8
4.03.8
vs
Honor Pad X6vsHuawei MatePad T8
4.03.8

