vs
3.0Display2.4
2.1Performance3.4
2.2Battery2.4
2.1Memory & storage2.2
2.1Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Viva 1003GMatePad T8
| Viva 1003G | MatePad T8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 246.2 mm | 199.7 mm | +46.5 mm |
| Width | 171.7 mm | 121.1 mm | +50.6 mm |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 8.6 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 479 g | 310 g | +169 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Viva 1003G better than MatePad T8?
- Screen size10.1″ vs 8″+26%
Why is MatePad T8 better than Viva 1003G?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+27%
- RAM2 GB vs 3 GB+50%
- Storage (max)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Cellular (LTE)No · Viva 1003G: Yes
- Weight479 g vs 310 g+55%
- CPU frequency1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz+54%
- Rear camera2 MP vs 5 MP2.5×
- Pixel density149 ppi vs 189 ppi+27%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- CPU cores4 vs 82×
- Max video720p vs 1080p
- Bluetooth4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 479 g | 310 g |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 246.2 mm | 199.7 mm |
| Width | 171.7 mm | 121.1 mm |
| Colours | Black | Deepsea Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 149 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70% | 76.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8321A | Mediatek MT8768 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 28 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-400 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage (max) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5 |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 720p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | EMUI 10 |
Related comparisons
vs
Allview Viva 1003GvsAmazon Fire HD 10 (2019)
3.64.3
vs
alcatel 3T 10vsAllview Viva 1003G
3.63.6
vs
Allview Viva 1003GvsAllview Viva 803G
3.63.5
vs
alcatel Smart Tab 7vsAllview Viva 1003G
3.53.6
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020)vsHuawei MatePad T8
3.93.8
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus (2020)vsHuawei MatePad T8
4.03.8