How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. iPad (2025) vs Pad 80 WiFi

Apple iPad (2025) vs OSCAL Pad 80 WiFi

What iPad (2025) does better (19) and where Pad 80 WiFi wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Apple iPad (2025)
Apple · 2025iPad (2025)
6.6Score
19 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
vs
OSCAL Pad 80 WiFi
OSCAL · 2025Pad 80 WiFi
5.7Score
6 advantages
6.1Display3.6
7.8Performance3.6
4.5Battery4.9
5.0Memory & storage6.5
7.7Features5.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

iPad (2025)Pad 80 WiFi
179.5 × 248.67161.9 × 246.89.1
iPad (2025)Pad 80 WiFiDifference
Height248.6 mm246.8 mm+1.8 mm
Width179.5 mm161.9 mm+17.6 mm
Thickness7 mm9.1 mm−2.1 mm
Weight477 g495 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iPad (2025) better than Pad 80 WiFi?

  1. Wired charging45 W vs 10 W4.5×
  2. CPU frequency3.46 GHz vs 1.6 GHz2.2×
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  4. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 80 WiFi: No
  5. 5GYes · Pad 80 WiFi: No
  6. Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
  7. Peak brightness500 nits vs 350 nits+43%
  8. Screen size11″ vs 10.5″+5%
  9. Pixel density264 ppi vs 215 ppi+23%
  10. eSIMYes · Pad 80 WiFi: No
  11. GPSYes · Pad 80 WiFi: No
  12. Max video4K vs 1080p

Why is Pad 80 WiFi better than iPad (2025)?

  1. Battery capacity7,606 mAh vs 8,200 mAh+8%
  2. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Memory card slotNo · iPad (2025): Yes
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iPad (2025): Yes
  5. CPU cores6 vs 8+33%
  6. Rear camera12 MP vs 13 MP+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight477 g495 g
Thickness7 mm9.1 mm
Height248.6 mm246.8 mm
Width179.5 mm161.9 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackAluminium—
Glass protectionScratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating—
ColoursSilver, Blue, Pink, YellowGrey, Blue
Display
Screen size11″10.5″
PanelLiquid Retina IPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,640 px1,200 px
Resolution (long side)2,360 px1,920 px
Pixel density264 ppi215 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits350 nits
Measured brightness466 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio80.1%80.2%
Performance
ChipsetApple A16 BionicUnisoc T606
Chip makerAppleUnisoc
Process4 nm12 nm
CPU cores68
CPU frequency3.46 GHz1.6 GHz
GPUApple GPUMali-G57 MP1
AnTuTu score1,414,489—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,157—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,604—
Memory
RAM6 GB6 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeNVMeUFS 2.1
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,606 mAh8,200 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)9.4 h—
Wired charging45 W10 W
Charged in 30 min34%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GYesNo
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)Yes—
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Satellite navigationGLONASS—
Features
Stylus supportYes—
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-28.8 LUFS—
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Fingerprint sensorYes—
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (top-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometerAccelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera12 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/1.8f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Front camera12 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchiPadOS 18.3.2Android 14
PlatformiPadOSAndroid
Interface—DokeOS 4.0
EU label
Energy classG—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle67 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare