zh.md
Compare
iPad Pro 13 (2025) vs Pad 7 Ultra

Apple iPad Pro 13 (2025) vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra

What iPad Pro 13 (2025) does better (8) and where Pad 7 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Apple · 2025iPad Pro 13 (2025)

9.2Score

8 advantages≈ $1,550

Xiaomi · 2025Pad 7 Ultra

9.7Score

9 advantages≈ $760

Higher score

9.6Display9.7

7.4Battery9.7

9.5Memory & storage9.4

9.4Features8.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

iPad Pro 13 (2025)Pad 7 Ultra

	iPad Pro 13 (2025)	Pad 7 Ultra	Difference
Height	281.6 mm	305.8 mm	−24.2 mm
Width	215.5 mm	207.5 mm	+8 mm
Thickness	5.1 mm	5.1 mm	=
Weight	579 g	609 g	−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iPad Pro 13 (2025) better than Pad 7 Ultra?

Storage (max)2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
5GYes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
eSIMYes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
GPSYes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
Weight579 g vs 609 g+5%
USB version4 vs 3.2+25%
Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is Pad 7 Ultra better than iPad Pro 13 (2025)?

Wired charging30 W vs 120 W4×
Battery capacity10,290 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+17%
Rear camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
Front camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
Screen size13″ vs 14″+8%
Pixel density265 ppi vs 275 ppi+4%
Resolution (long side)2,752 px vs 3,200 px+16%
Screen-to-body ratio86.2% vs 92%+7%
Resolution (short side)2,064 px vs 2,136 px+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Apple iPad Pro 13 (2025)≈ $1,5509.2	Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra≈ $7609.7
Design
Weight	579 g	609 g
Thickness	5.1 mm	5.1 mm
Height	281.6 mm	305.8 mm
Width	215.5 mm	207.5 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP42	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Glass protection	Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Silver, Space Black	Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size	13″	14″
Panel	Ultra Retina Tandem OLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (short side)	2,064 px	2,136 px
Resolution (long side)	2,752 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	265 ppi	275 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,600 nits	1,600 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.2%	92%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Apple M5	Xring O1
Chip maker	Apple	Xring
Process	—	3 nm
CPU cores	—	10
CPU frequency	—	3.7 GHz
GPU	Apple GPU	Immortalis-G925 MP16
AnTuTu score	—	2,963,052
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	9,191
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	2,048 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	NVMe	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,290 mAh	12,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	30 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	6	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 4 (Thunderbolt 3)	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version	4	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	—	Side / power button
3D face unlock (Face ID)	Yes	—
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	12 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Front camera	12 MP	32 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	iPadOS 26	Android 15
Platform	iPadOS	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	G	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	76 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	E	—