vs
6.9Display6.0
9.8Battery9.8
9.7Memory & storage8.8
Why is Active 12 Pro better than R9 Ultra?
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Battery capacity30,000 mAh vs 20,800 mAh+44%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · R9 Ultra: No
- Peak brightness650 nits vs 400 nits+62%
- Repairability classB vs C
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.2% vs 71.5%+2%
Why is R9 Ultra better than Active 12 Pro?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Weight1,522 g vs 1,066 g+43%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Energy classG vs E
- Drop resistance classB vs A
- Endurance per cycle160 h vs 259 h+62%
- Thickness28.3 mm vs 17.8 mm+59%
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1,522 g | 1,066 g |
| Thickness | 28.3 mm | 17.8 mm |
| Height | 267.7 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 179 mm | 182 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black | Black, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 650 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 677 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.2% | 71.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 711,905 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,220 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 878 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 30,000 mAh | 20,800 mAh |
| Wired charging | 120 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side / power button | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 108 MP | — |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | DokeOS 4.2 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | E |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 160 h | 259 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | B | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Blackview Active 12 ProvsLenovo Legion Tab G3
vs
Blackview Active 12 ProvsOnePlus Pad 3
8.99.3
vs
Blackview Active 12 ProvsZTE RedMagic Astra
8.99.0
vs
Blackview Active 12 ProvsZebra ET401 8
vs
Blackview Active 12 ProvsBlackview Active 10 Pro
8.98.9
vs
Blackview Active 12 ProvsBlackview Active 8 Pro
8.97.8