vs
5.0Display6.7
5.4Performance4.7
5.0Battery6.2
7.6Memory & storage5.2
6.4Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 16 ProPad Neo
| Tab 16 Pro | Pad Neo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 256.8 mm | 255.1 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 188 mm | −21 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 6.9 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 503 g | 538 g | −35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 16 Pro better than Pad Neo?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight503 g vs 538 g+7%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Pad Neo better than Tab 16 Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Battery capacity7,700 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+4%
- Screen size11″ vs 11.4″+4%
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 260 ppi+26%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 1,720 px+43%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,408 px+25%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 6.9 mm+9%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 503 g | 538 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 256.8 mm | 255.1 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 188 mm |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Violet | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 11.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,720 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.8% | 82.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 545,546 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,872 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,700 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 13.2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 98 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad mini (2024)vsBlackview Tab 16 Pro
6.66.3
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsInfinix Xpad
6.36.2
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsSamsung Galaxy Tab Active5
6.36.0
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsLenovo Tab Plus
6.36.5
vs
Blackview Tab 60 ProvsBlackview Tab 16 Pro
5.96.3