vs
4.1Display2.6
2.2Performance3.4
3.2Battery2.4
2.3Memory & storage2.7
2.6Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 8EMatePad T 10
| Tab 8E | MatePad T 10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 243.6 mm | 240.2 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Width | 162.4 mm | 159 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.9 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 600 g | 450 g | +150 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 8E better than MatePad T 10?
- Battery capacity6,580 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+29%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
- Front camera5 MP vs 2 MP2.5×
- Pixel density224 ppi vs 156 ppi+44%
- Screen size10.1″ vs 9.7″+4%
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,280 px+50%
- Bluetooth5 vs 4.2+19%
- Screen-to-body ratio74.8% vs 71.4%+5%
Why is MatePad T 10 better than Tab 8E?
- Storage (max)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Cellular (LTE)No · Tab 8E: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Tab 8E: Yes
- RAM3 GB vs 4 GB+33%
- Weight600 g vs 450 g+33%
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz+25%
- Process28 nm vs 14 nm2×
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.9 mm+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 600 g | 450 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 243.6 mm | 240.2 mm |
| Width | 162.4 mm | 159 mm |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass | — |
| Colours | Gray, Gold | Deepsea Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 9.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 224 ppi | 156 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.8% | 71.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A | Kirin 710A |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Kirin |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,580 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | EMUI 10.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Blackview Tab 8EvsSamsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
3.94.0
vs
Blackview Tab 8EvsMotorola Tab G20
3.93.8
vs
Blackview Tab 8EvsUmidigi G3 Tab
3.93.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LitevsHuawei MatePad T 10
4.04.0
vs
Amazon Fire HD 10 (2021)vsHuawei MatePad T 10
4.44.0
vs
Cubot Tab 10vsHuawei MatePad T 10
4.24.0