How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Zeno 1 vs Pad X9a

Blackview Zeno 1 vs Honor Pad X9a

What Zeno 1 does better (10) and where Pad X9a wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Blackview Zeno 1
Blackview · 2025Zeno 1
5.0Score
10 advantages
vs
Honor Pad X9a
Honor · 2025Pad X9a
6.3Score
15 advantages≈ $230
Higher score
3.2Display6.9
4.0Performance4.7
3.8Battery6.7
4.7Memory & storage5.6
6.8Features3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Zeno 1Pad X9a
125.9 × 198.68.2167.4 × 267.36.8
Zeno 1Pad X9aDifference
Height198.6 mm267.3 mm−68.7 mm
Width125.9 mm167.4 mm−41.5 mm
Thickness8.2 mm6.8 mm+1.4 mm
Weight336 g475 g−138 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Zeno 1 better than Pad X9a?

  1. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad X9a: No
  2. Weight336 g vs 475 g+41%
  3. Memory card slotYes · Pad X9a: No
  4. GPSYes · Pad X9a: No
  5. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Pad X9a: No
  6. Energy classA vs F
  7. Repairability classB vs C
  8. Drop resistance classC vs E
  9. Endurance per cycle167 h vs 92 h+80%
  10. Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%

Why is Pad X9a better than Zeno 1?

  1. Wired charging10 W vs 35 W3.5×
  2. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 8,300 mAh+38%
  3. Screen size8″ vs 11.5″+44%
  4. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  5. RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
  6. CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+56%
  7. Pixel density189 ppi vs 254 ppi+34%
  8. Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
  9. Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
  10. Resolution (long side)1,280 px vs 2,508 px+96%
  11. Peak brightness350 nits vs 400 nits+14%
  12. Resolution (short side)800 px vs 1,504 px+88%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Pad X9aHonor Pad X9a≈ $2306.3
Design
Weight336 g475 g
Thickness8.2 mm6.8 mm
Height198.6 mm267.3 mm
Width125.9 mm167.4 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
ColoursRock Black, Space Orange, Jungle GreenGray
Display
Screen size8″11.5″
PanelIPS LCDTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)800 px1,504 px
Resolution (long side)1,280 px2,508 px
Pixel density189 ppi254 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness350 nits400 nits
Screen-to-body ratio74.2%84.1%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T615Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685
Chip makerUnisocQualcomm
Process12 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency1.8 GHz2.8 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 610
AnTuTu score—515,968
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—1,463
Memory
RAM6 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)64 GB128 GB
Storage typeeMMC 5.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh8,300 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Ion
Wired charging10 W35 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.1
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB version—2
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS—
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera8 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2.2f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera8 MP5 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—MagicOS 9
EU label
Energy classAF
Battery charge cycles8001,200
Endurance per cycle167 h92 h
Repairability classBC
Drop resistance classCE
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare