vs
7.6Memory & storage8.0
Why is Tab 50 better than Terra Pad 1201?
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Terra Pad 1201: No
- Weight455 g vs 550 g+21%
Why is Terra Pad 1201 better than Tab 50?
- Screen size10.4″ vs 12.6″+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 455 g | 550 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | — |
| Height | 246.4 mm | 7 mm |
| Width | 161.5 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.4″ | 12.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,000 px | — |
| Pixel density | 224 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | MediaTek |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,500 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Front camera | 5 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | E |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 118 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | E |
