How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
630 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Tab KingKong S vs IS945.1

Cubot Tab KingKong S vs i.safe MOBILE IS945.1

What Tab KingKong S does better (4) and where IS945.1 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cubot Tab KingKong S
Cubot · 2025Tab KingKong S
7.1Score
4 advantages
Higher score
vs
i.safe MOBILE IS945.1
i.safe MOBILE · 2025IS945.1
3 advantages≈ $4,400
6.5Memory & storage4.9

Why is Tab KingKong S better than IS945.1?

  1. Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  2. Cellular (LTE)Yes · IS945.1: No
  3. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  4. Weight912 g vs 1,059 g+16%

Why is IS945.1 better than Tab KingKong S?

  1. RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
  2. eSIMNo · Tab KingKong S: Yes
  3. Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight912 g1,059 g
Thickness15.6 mm—
Height246.4 mm20 mm
Width164.4 mm—
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursBlack—
Display
Screen size10.1″10.1″
PanelIPS LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)800 px—
Resolution (long side)1,280 px—
Pixel density149 ppi—
Refresh rate90 Hz—
Screen-to-body ratio73%—
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T616Qualcomm
Chip makerUnisocQualcomm
Process12 nm—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency2 GHz—
GPUMali-G57 MP1—
Memory
RAM6 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB128 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Memory card slotYes—
Battery
Battery capacity15,300 mAh—
Wired charging33 W—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5—
Bluetooth55.2
USBUSB Type-C—
NFCNo—
GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS—
Features
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5 mm headphone jackYes—
SensorsAccelerometer—
Cameras
Rear camera48 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Max video1080p—
Front camera16 MP—
4K front-camera videoNo—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15—
PlatformAndroid—
EU label
Energy classG—
Battery charge cycles1,400—
Endurance per cycle37 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare