How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Tab KingKong S vs Poco Pad M1

Cubot Tab KingKong S vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

What Tab KingKong S does better (6) and where Poco Pad M1 wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Cubot Tab KingKong S
Cubot · 2025Tab KingKong S
7.1Score
6 advantages
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad M1
7.8Score
14 advantages
Higher score
3.8Display7.6
4.3Performance5.7
8.0Battery9.1
6.5Memory & storage7.6
9.7Features5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Tab KingKong SPoco Pad M1
164.4 × 246.415.6181.7 × 279.87.5
Tab KingKong SPoco Pad M1Difference
Height246.4 mm279.8 mm−33.4 mm
Width164.4 mm181.7 mm−17.3 mm
Thickness15.6 mm7.5 mm+8.1 mm
Weight912 g610 g+302 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Tab KingKong S better than Poco Pad M1?

  1. Battery capacity15,300 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+27%
  2. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Poco Pad M1: No
  3. Rear camera48 MP vs 8 MP6×
  4. GPSYes · Poco Pad M1: No
  5. Front camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
  6. Battery charge cycles1,400 vs 1,000+40%

Why is Poco Pad M1 better than Tab KingKong S?

  1. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  2. RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
  3. Pixel density149 ppi vs 249 ppi+67%
  4. Screen size10.1″ vs 12.1″+20%
  5. Weight912 g vs 610 g+50%
  6. Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
  7. Endurance per cycle37 h vs 103 h2.8×
  8. CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+35%
  9. Thickness15.6 mm vs 7.5 mm2.1×
  10. Resolution (short side)800 px vs 1,600 px2×
  11. Resolution (long side)1,280 px vs 2,560 px2×
  12. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight912 g610 g
Thickness15.6 mm7.5 mm
Height246.4 mm279.8 mm
Width164.4 mm181.7 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursBlackGray, Blue
Display
Screen size10.1″12.1″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)800 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)1,280 px2,560 px
Pixel density149 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—600 nits
Measured brightness—581 nits
Screen-to-body ratio73%83.5%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T616Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip makerUnisocQualcomm
Process12 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2 GHz2.7 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 810
AnTuTu score—817,549
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—1,244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,103
Memory
RAM6 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity15,300 mAh12,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—14.8 h
Wired charging33 W33 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth55.4
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS—
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera48 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera16 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy classGG
Battery charge cycles1,4001,000
Endurance per cycle37 h103 h
Repairability classCC
Drop resistance classAA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare