How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Tab E3 Max vs Moto Pad 60 Pro

Doogee Tab E3 Max vs Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro

What Tab E3 Max does better (6) and where Moto Pad 60 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Doogee Tab E3 Max
Doogee · 2025Tab E3 Max
7.6Score
6 advantages≈ $310
vs
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
Motorola · 2025Moto Pad 60 Pro
8.3Score
12 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
6.1Display7.2
6.6Performance8.2
7.4Battery8.8
7.6Memory & storage7.0
9.2Features5.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Tab E3 MaxMoto Pad 60 Pro
221.8 × 318.78.9189.1 × 291.86.9
Tab E3 MaxMoto Pad 60 ProDifference
Height318.7 mm291.8 mm+26.9 mm
Width221.8 mm189.1 mm+32.7 mm
Thickness8.9 mm6.9 mm+2 mm
Weight1,002 g620 g+382 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Tab E3 Max better than Moto Pad 60 Pro?

  1. Battery capacity13,500 mAh vs 10,200 mAh+32%
  2. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Moto Pad 60 Pro: No
  3. Screen size14″ vs 12.7″+10%
  4. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  5. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Moto Pad 60 Pro: No
  6. Rear camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%

Why is Moto Pad 60 Pro better than Tab E3 Max?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
  2. Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
  3. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  4. Weight1,002 g vs 620 g+62%
  5. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+52%
  6. Pixel density185 ppi vs 273 ppi+48%
  7. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
  8. Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
  9. Resolution (long side)2,160 px vs 2,944 px+36%
  10. Thickness8.9 mm vs 6.9 mm+29%
  11. Resolution (short side)1,440 px vs 1,840 px+28%
  12. Screen-to-body ratio82.6% vs 84.8%+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight1,002 g620 g
Thickness8.9 mm6.9 mm
Height318.7 mm291.8 mm
Width221.8 mm189.1 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protection—IP52
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx2
ColoursBlack, Gray, BluePantone: Bronze Green
Display
Screen size14″12.7″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,440 px1,840 px
Resolution (long side)2,160 px2,944 px
Pixel density185 ppi273 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness—400 nits
Measured brightness—392 nits
Screen-to-body ratio82.6%84.8%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99Mediatek Dimensity 8300
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz3.35 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali G615-MC6
AnTuTu score—1,564,600
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—4,370
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity13,500 mAh10,200 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Wired charging18 W45 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.3
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)—Yes
NFCNoNo
GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Fingerprint sensor—Side / power button
SensorsAccelerometer, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera16 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2.2—
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera8 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised—2
EU label
Energy classG—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle59 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare