Why is U13 Pro better than Pad 200?
- Battery capacity11,000 mAh vs 8,300 mAh+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Peak brightness370 nits vs 350 nits+6%
- Battery charge cycles1,100 vs 800+38%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is Pad 200 better than U13 Pro?
- Energy classG vs D
- Drop resistance classE vs C
- Endurance per cycle77 h vs 138 h+79%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 740 g | 750 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | — | 201.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP20 | IP50 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx0 |
| Colours | Aquamarine Blue, Misty Gray, Obsidian Black | Space Grey, Glacier Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13.4″ | 13.4″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 169 ppi | 169 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 370 nits | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 83.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | 8,300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | DokeOS 5.0 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 77 h | 138 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | C |
