vs
5.8Display6.5
Why is U13 better than IdeaTab 2025?
- Screen size13″ vs 11″+18%
- Battery charge cycles1,100 vs 1,000+10%
Why is IdeaTab 2025 better than U13?
- Peak brightness350 nits vs 500 nits+43%
- Weight670 g vs 480 g+40%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx2
- Repairability classB vs A
- Endurance per cycle77 h vs 94 h+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 670 g | 480 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | — |
| Height | 8 mm | 7 mm |
| Width | 197.2 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP20 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | — |
| Pixel density | 174 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 350 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | MediaTek |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 77 h | 94 h |
| Repairability class | B | A |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
