How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. MagicPad 3 vs Pad Mini

Honor MagicPad 3 vs Xiaomi Pad Mini

What MagicPad 3 does better (11) and where Pad Mini wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Honor MagicPad 3
Honor · 2025MagicPad 3
9.4Score
11 advantages≈ $390
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Pad Mini
Xiaomi · 2025Pad Mini
8.7Score
6 advantages≈ $400
9.4Display7.9
8.9Performance9.2
9.5Battery7.2
9.4Memory & storage8.7
7.7Features7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

MagicPad 3Pad Mini
201.4 × 293.95.8132 × 205.16.5
MagicPad 3Pad MiniDifference
Height293.9 mm205.1 mm+88.8 mm
Width201.4 mm132 mm+69.4 mm
Thickness5.8 mm6.5 mm−0.7 mm
Weight595 g326 g+269 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MagicPad 3 better than Pad Mini?

  1. Battery capacity12,450 mAh vs 7,500 mAh+66%
  2. Screen size13.3″ vs 8.8″+51%
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  4. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  5. Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 700 nits+43%
  6. Measured brightness703 nits vs 668 nits+5%
  7. Resolution (short side)2,136 px vs 1,880 px+14%
  8. Front camera9 MP vs 8 MP+12%
  9. Thickness5.8 mm vs 6.5 mm+12%
  10. Screen-to-body ratio89% vs 82.9%+7%
  11. Resolution (long side)3,200 px vs 3,008 px+6%

Why is Pad Mini better than MagicPad 3?

  1. AnTuTu score2,333,285 vs 2,845,550+22%
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,707 vs 9,086+35%
  3. Weight595 g vs 326 g+83%
  4. Pixel density289 ppi vs 403 ppi+39%
  5. CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.73 GHz+13%
  6. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor MagicPad 3Honor MagicPad 3≈ $3909.4
Xiaomi Pad MiniXiaomi Pad Mini≈ $4008.7
Design
Weight595 g326 g
Thickness5.8 mm6.5 mm
Height293.9 mm205.1 mm
Width201.4 mm132 mm
ColoursGray, White, GoldGray, Purple
Display
Screen size13.3″8.8″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)2,136 px1,880 px
Resolution (long side)3,200 px3,008 px
Pixel density289 ppi403 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness1,000 nits700 nits
Measured brightness703 nits668 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89%82.9%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.73 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score2,333,2852,845,550
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,7079,086
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity12,450 mAh7,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—13.7 h
Wired charging66 W67 W
Charged in 30 min—57%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
USBUSB Type-C 3.21x USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.23.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)YesYes
NFCNoNo
GPSNoNo
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyroAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2f/2.2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Front camera9 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoYesNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 9HyperOS 2
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare