How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad 9 vs Spider 8

Honor Pad 9 vs OSCAL Spider 8

What Pad 9 does better (15) and where Spider 8 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Honor Pad 9
Honor · 2023Pad 9
7.0Score
15 advantages≈ $210
Higher score
vs
OSCAL Spider 8
OSCAL · 2023Spider 8
7.0Score
3 advantages≈ $240
7.4Display4.2
5.6Performance5.4
5.5Battery9.1
8.3Memory & storage5.2
5.1Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pad 9Spider 8
180.1 × 278.26.9170.1 × 251.314.9
Pad 9Spider 8Difference
Height278.2 mm251.3 mm+26.9 mm
Width180.1 mm170.1 mm+10 mm
Thickness6.9 mm14.9 mm−8 mm
Weight555 g854 g−299 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pad 9 better than Spider 8?

  1. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
  3. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  4. 5GYes · Spider 8: No
  5. Screen size12.1″ vs 10.1″+20%
  6. Weight555 g vs 854 g+54%
  7. Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
  8. Thickness6.9 mm vs 14.9 mm2.2×
  9. Max video4K vs 1080p
  10. Pixel density249 ppi vs 224 ppi+11%
  11. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
  12. Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%

Why is Spider 8 better than Pad 9?

  1. Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 13,000 mAh+57%
  2. GPSNo · Pad 9: Yes
  3. Front camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Pad 9Honor Pad 9≈ $2107.0
OSCAL Spider 8OSCAL Spider 8≈ $2407.0
Design
Weight555 g854 g
Thickness6.9 mm14.9 mm
Height278.2 mm251.3 mm
Width180.1 mm170.1 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackAluminium—
Ingress protection—IP68
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protectionAnti-glare glassCorning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursGray, Blue, WhiteBlack, Orange
Display
Screen size12.1″10.1″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,600 px1,200 px
Resolution (long side)2,560 px1,920 px
Pixel density249 ppi224 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits—
Measured brightness530 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio84.7%69.2%
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1Unisoc Tiger T616
Chip makerQualcommUnisoc
Process4 nm12 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz2 GHz
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G57 MP1
AnTuTu score495,329—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,724—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme608—
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)512 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity8,300 mAh13,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)9.3 h—
Wired charging35 W33 W
Charged in 30 min38%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesYes
5GYesNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.15
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
NFCNoNo
GPSNoYes
Satellite navigation—GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-22 LUFS—
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2—
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate30 fps—
Front camera8 MP16 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagic UI 7.2DokeOS 3.0
Major OS updates promised1—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare