How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad X9 vs Galaxy Tab A9+

Honor Pad X9 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+

What Pad X9 does better (9) and where Galaxy Tab A9+ wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Honor Pad X9
Honor · 2023Pad X9
5.4Score
9 advantages≈ $270
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab A9+
5.8Score
11 advantages≈ $240
Higher score
6.3Display6.0
4.2Performance5.1
6.1Battery3.9
3.6Memory & storage5.5
3.1Features6.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pad X9Galaxy Tab A9+
167.4 × 267.36.9168.7 × 257.16.9
Pad X9Galaxy Tab A9+Difference
Height267.3 mm257.1 mm+10.2 mm
Width167.4 mm168.7 mm−1.3 mm
Thickness6.9 mm6.9 mm=
Weight495 g480 g+15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pad X9 better than Galaxy Tab A9+?

  1. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
  2. Battery capacity7,250 mAh vs 7,040 mAh+3%
  3. Wired charging22 W vs 15 W+50%
  4. Screen size11.5″ vs 11″+5%
  5. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+27%
  6. Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
  7. Charged in 30 min34% vs 25%+36%
  8. Resolution (long side)2,000 px vs 1,920 px+4%
  9. Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 80.9%+4%

Why is Galaxy Tab A9+ better than Pad X9?

  1. RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
  2. AnTuTu score461,236 vs 582,451+26%
  3. Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  4. 5GNo · Pad X9: Yes
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,551 vs 2,072+34%
  6. Memory card slotNo · Pad X9: Yes
  7. eSIMNo · Pad X9: Yes
  8. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pad X9: Yes
  9. Peak brightness450 nits vs 500 nits+11%
  10. Weight495 g vs 480 g+3%
  11. Rear camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Pad X9Honor Pad X9≈ $2705.4
Design
Weight495 g480 g
Thickness6.9 mm6.9 mm
Height267.3 mm257.1 mm
Width167.4 mm168.7 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackAluminium—
ColoursSpace GrayGraphite, Silver, Navy
Display
Screen size11.5″11″
PanelTFT LCDTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px1,200 px
Resolution (long side)2,000 px1,920 px
Pixel density203 ppi206 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz90 Hz
Peak brightness450 nits500 nits
Measured brightness452 nits456 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%80.9%
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process6 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 619
AnTuTu score461,236582,451
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,5512,072
Memory
RAM4 GB8 GB
Storage (max)128 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB64 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,250 mAh7,040 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)13.3 h—
Wired charging22 W15 W
Charged in 30 min34%25%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesYes
5GNoYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.15.1
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
NFCNoNo
GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-23.5 LUFS—
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera5 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2.2—
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera5 MP5 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 7.1One UI 8
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare