How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad X9a vs Megapad 11

Honor Pad X9a vs Tecno Megapad 11

What Pad X9a does better (11) and where Megapad 11 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Honor Pad X9a
Honor · 2025Pad X9a
6.3Score
11 advantages≈ $230
vs
Tecno Megapad 11
Tecno · 2025Megapad 11
6.7Score
7 advantages≈ $220
Higher score
6.9Display6.0
4.7Performance6.6
6.7Battery5.2
5.6Memory & storage6.1
3.0Features8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pad X9aMegapad 11
167.4 × 267.36.8168.7 × 257.17.6
Pad X9aMegapad 11Difference
Height267.3 mm257.1 mm+10.2 mm
Width167.4 mm168.7 mm−1.3 mm
Thickness6.8 mm7.6 mm−0.8 mm
Weight475 g510 g−35 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pad X9a better than Megapad 11?

  1. Wired charging35 W vs 18 W+94%
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
  3. Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+4%
  4. Screen size11.5″ vs 11″+5%
  5. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+27%
  6. Pixel density254 ppi vs 206 ppi+23%
  7. Weight475 g vs 510 g+7%
  8. Resolution (long side)2,508 px vs 1,920 px+31%
  9. Resolution (short side)1,504 px vs 1,200 px+25%
  10. Thickness6.8 mm vs 7.6 mm+12%
  11. Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 80.9%+4%

Why is Megapad 11 better than Pad X9a?

  1. Cellular (LTE)No · Pad X9a: Yes
  2. Memory card slotNo · Pad X9a: Yes
  3. GPSNo · Pad X9a: Yes
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pad X9a: Yes
  5. Peak brightness400 nits vs 440 nits+10%
  6. Rear camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
  7. Front camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Pad X9aHonor Pad X9a≈ $2306.3
Tecno Megapad 11Tecno Megapad 11≈ $2206.7
Design
Weight475 g510 g
Thickness6.8 mm7.6 mm
Height267.3 mm257.1 mm
Width167.4 mm168.7 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackAluminium—
ColoursGrayVitality Green, Starfall Grey
Display
Screen size11.5″11″
PanelTFT LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,504 px1,200 px
Resolution (long side)2,508 px1,920 px
Pixel density254 ppi206 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz90 Hz
Peak brightness400 nits440 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%80.9%
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685Mediatek Helio G99
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process6 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score515,968—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,463—
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity8,300 mAh8,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-Ion—
Wired charging35 W18 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoYes
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.15.2
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB version2—
NFCNoNo
GPSNoYes
Features
Stylus supportYes—
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera8 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2—
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera5 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 9—
EU label
Energy classF—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle92 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare