Why is R9 Ultra better than V12X?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Endurance per cycle259 h vs 118 h2.2×
- Drop resistance classA vs E
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 800+25%
Why is V12X better than R9 Ultra?
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Screen size11″ vs 12.6″+15%
- Repairability classC vs B
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1,066 g | — |
| Thickness | 17.8 mm | — |
| Height | 18 mm | 6 mm |
| Width | 182 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Black, Red | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 12.6″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | — |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 71.5% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | MediaTek Helio |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 20,800 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | E |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 259 h | 118 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | A | E |
