vs
7.8Display4.9
7.7Performance5.4
4.7Battery4.8
6.1Memory & storage7.6
6.4Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 11 (2023)A15 Tab
| MatePad 11 (2023) | A15 Tab | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 253.7 mm | 257.5 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Width | 165.3 mm | 162 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.5 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 480 g | 491 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 11 (2023) better than A15 Tab?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+60%
- Pixel density275 ppi vs 212 ppi+30%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Wired charging22 W vs 20 W+12%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Weight480 g vs 491 g+2%
- Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 1,200 px+33%
- Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 2,000 px+28%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 7.5 mm+4%
Why is A15 Tab better than MatePad 11 (2023)?
- Cellular (LTE)No · MatePad 11 (2023): Yes
- Battery capacity7,250 mAh vs 7,500 mAh+3%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- GPSNo · MatePad 11 (2023): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 491 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 253.7 mm | 257.5 mm |
| Width | 165.3 mm | 162 mm |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White, Purple | Space Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 275 ppi | 212 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 420 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.1% | 82.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | Unisoc Tiger T616 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,250 mAh | 7,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 20 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 3.1 | Android 13 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Pad 6vsHuawei MatePad 11 (2023)
7.27.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FEvsHuawei MatePad 11 (2023)
7.27.2
vs
Huawei MatePad 11 (2023)vsLenovo Tab P12
7.27.2
vs
Doogee T30 ProvsHuawei MatePad 11 (2023)
7.57.2
vs
Huawei MatePad 11 (2023)vsHuawei MatePad 11 (2021)
7.26.8
vs
Huawei MatePad 11 (2023)vsOSCAL Pad 18
7.27.1