vs
7.7Display5.5
7.6Battery7.4
5.6Memory & storage6.1
5.1Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 11.5 (2025)Tab Plus
| MatePad 11.5 (2025) | Tab Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 262.6 mm | 268.3 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Width | 177.5 mm | 174.3 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 6.1 mm | 7.7 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Weight | 515 g | 650 g | −135 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 11.5 (2025) better than Tab Plus?
- Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 8,600 mAh+17%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 400 nits+50%
- Weight515 g vs 650 g+26%
- Pixel density256 ppi vs 203 ppi+26%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- CPU frequency2.29 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+4%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 1,200 px+33%
- Thickness6.1 mm vs 7.7 mm+26%
- Resolution (long side)2,456 px vs 2,000 px+23%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.1% vs 80.5%+3%
Why is Tab Plus better than MatePad 11.5 (2025)?
- Memory card slotNo · MatePad 11.5 (2025): Yes
- GPSNo · MatePad 11.5 (2025): Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · MatePad 11.5 (2025): Yes
- Energy classG vs D
- Repairability classC vs A
- Drop resistance classE vs D
- Wired charging40 W vs 45 W+12%
- Endurance per cycle80 h vs 134 h+68%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 515 g | 650 g |
| Thickness | 6.1 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 262.6 mm | 268.3 mm |
| Width | 177.5 mm | 174.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Violet, Space Gray | Luna grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.5″ | 11.5″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,456 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 256 ppi | 203 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 436 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.1% | 80.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T82B | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.29 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 920c | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 545,546 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,024 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 8,600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Harmony OS 4.3 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Other (Windows, …) | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 80 h | 134 h |
| Repairability class | C | A |
| Drop resistance class | E | D |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab ProvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
vs
VALE V12XvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
vs
Blackview Mega 2vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
7.37.5
vs
Doogee Tab E3 MaxvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
7.67.5
vs
Lenovo Tab PlusvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201