How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
630 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. MatePad 11.5 (2025) vs Poco Pad M1

Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

What MatePad 11.5 (2025) does better (5) and where Poco Pad M1 wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Huawei · 2025MatePad 11.5 (2025)
7.5Score
5 advantages≈ $310
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad M1
7.8Score
10 advantages
Higher score
7.8Display7.7
7.6Battery9.1
5.6Memory & storage7.6
5.0Features5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad 11.5 (2025)Poco Pad M1
177.5 × 262.66.1181.7 × 279.87.5
MatePad 11.5 (2025)Poco Pad M1Difference
Height262.6 mm279.8 mm−17.2 mm
Width177.5 mm181.7 mm−4.2 mm
Thickness6.1 mm7.5 mm−1.4 mm
Weight515 g610 g−95 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad 11.5 (2025) better than Poco Pad M1?

  1. Wired charging40 W vs 33 W+21%
  2. Weight515 g vs 610 g+18%
  3. Pixel density256 ppi vs 249 ppi+3%
  4. Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
  5. Thickness6.1 mm vs 7.5 mm+23%

Why is Poco Pad M1 better than MatePad 11.5 (2025)?

  1. Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+19%
  2. Screen size11.5″ vs 12.1″+5%
  3. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  4. Memory card slotNo · MatePad 11.5 (2025): Yes
  5. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · MatePad 11.5 (2025): Yes
  6. Drop resistance classE vs A
  7. CPU frequency2.29 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+18%
  8. Endurance per cycle80 h vs 103 h+29%
  9. Resolution (long side)2,456 px vs 2,560 px+4%
  10. Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight515 g610 g
Thickness6.1 mm7.5 mm
Height262.6 mm279.8 mm
Width177.5 mm181.7 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
ColoursViolet, Space GrayGray, Blue
Display
Screen size11.5″12.1″
PanelTFT LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,600 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)2,456 px2,560 px
Pixel density256 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits600 nits
Measured brightness—581 nits
Screen-to-body ratio83.1%83.5%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetKirin T82BQualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip makerKirinQualcomm
Process—4 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency2.29 GHz2.7 GHz
GPUMaleoon 920cAdreno 810
AnTuTu score—817,549
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—1,244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,103
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity10,100 mAh12,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—14.8 h
Wired charging40 W33 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.4
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
NFCNoNo
GPSNoNo
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperturef/1.8f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera8 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchHarmony OS 4.3Android 15
PlatformOther (Windows, …)Android
Interface—HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy classGG
Battery charge cycles1,0001,000
Endurance per cycle80 h103 h
Repairability classCC
Drop resistance classEA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare