vs
7.7Display7.8
8.3Battery7.5
6.7Memory & storage6.1
5.1Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 11.5 (2026)Poco Pad 5G
| MatePad 11.5 (2026) | Poco Pad 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 262.6 mm | 280 mm | −17.4 mm |
| Width | 177.5 mm | 181.9 mm | −4.4 mm |
| Thickness | 6.1 mm | 7.5 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Weight | 515 g | 568 g | −53 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 11.5 (2026) better than Poco Pad 5G?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Wired charging40 W vs 33 W+21%
- Weight515 g vs 568 g+10%
- Pixel density255 ppi vs 249 ppi+2%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Thickness6.1 mm vs 7.5 mm+23%
Why is Poco Pad 5G better than MatePad 11.5 (2026)?
- Cellular (LTE)No · MatePad 11.5 (2026): Yes
- Screen size11.5″ vs 12.1″+5%
- Memory card slotNo · MatePad 11.5 (2026): Yes
- GPSNo · MatePad 11.5 (2026): Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · MatePad 11.5 (2026): Yes
- CPU frequency2.29 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+5%
- Resolution (long side)2,456 px vs 2,560 px+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 515 g | 568 g |
| Thickness | 6.1 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 262.6 mm | 280 mm |
| Width | 177.5 mm | 181.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Violet, Gray, Silver, Blue | Dark Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.5″ | 12.1″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,456 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 255 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7% | 83.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T82B | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.29 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 920c | Adreno 710 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Harmony OS 5.1 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Other (Windows, …) | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2026)
vs
Lenovo Tab K11 G2vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2026)
vs
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2026)vsBestTab T60
7.98.0
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2026)
7.87.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G
7.97.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad 5GvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.97.6