zh.md
Compare
MatePad 11.5 S (2025) vs Poco Pad M1

Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

What MatePad 11.5 S (2025) does better (13) and where Poco Pad M1 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2025MatePad 11.5 S (2025)

8.0Score

13 advantages≈ $270

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad M1

7.8Score

8 advantages

8.0Display7.6

7.1Performance5.7

7.2Battery9.1

8.7Memory & storage7.6

5.8Features5.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad 11.5 S (2025)Poco Pad M1

	MatePad 11.5 S (2025)	Poco Pad M1	Difference
Height	261 mm	279.8 mm	−18.8 mm
Width	177.3 mm	181.7 mm	−4.4 mm
Thickness	6.1 mm	7.5 mm	−1.4 mm
Weight	515 g	610 g	−95 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad 11.5 S (2025) better than Poco Pad M1?

Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,866 vs 1,2443.1×
AnTuTu score1,092,572 vs 817,549+34%
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Wired charging40 W vs 33 W+21%
Weight515 g vs 610 g+18%
Pixel density291 ppi vs 249 ppi+17%
Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
Thickness6.1 mm vs 7.5 mm+23%
Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,600 px+15%

Why is Poco Pad M1 better than MatePad 11.5 S (2025)?

Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+36%
Screen size11.5″ vs 12.1″+5%
Memory card slotNo · MatePad 11.5 S (2025): Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · MatePad 11.5 S (2025): Yes
Peak brightness500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
CPU frequency2.29 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+18%
Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025)≈ $2708.0	Xiaomi Poco Pad M17.8
Design
Weight	515 g	610 g
Thickness	6.1 mm	7.5 mm
Height	261 mm	279.8 mm
Width	177.3 mm	181.7 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Colours	Gray, Silver, Mint, Purple	Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size	11.5″	12.1″
Panel	TFT LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	291 ppi	249 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	500 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	—	581 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.6%	83.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	HiSilicon Kirin 9020	Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	7 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.29 GHz	2.7 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 920	Adreno 810
AnTuTu score	1,092,572	817,549
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,866	1,244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,103
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	8,800 mAh	12,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	14.8 h
Wired charging	40 W	33 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.1	2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	—
NFC	No	No
GPS	No	No
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Sensors	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	8 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Harmony OS 5.0	Android 15
Platform	Other (Windows, …)	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	—	G
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	103 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A

Related comparisons

Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 ProvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) 7.98.0

Honor Pad 10vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025) 7.98.0

Lenovo IdeaTab 2025vsXiaomi Poco Pad M1

Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1vsXiaomi Poco Pad M1

Lenovo IdeaTab ProvsXiaomi Poco Pad M1