How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. MatePad 11.5 vs Poco Pad

Huawei MatePad 11.5 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad

What MatePad 11.5 does better (3) and where Poco Pad wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Huawei MatePad 11.5
Huawei · 2023MatePad 11.5
7.1Score
3 advantages≈ $310
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad
Xiaomi · 2024Poco Pad
7.3Score
9 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
7.4Display7.6
7.6Performance5.8
5.6Battery6.0
5.6Memory & storage7.6
5.7Features6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad 11.5Poco Pad
176.8 × 260.96.9181.9 × 2807.5
MatePad 11.5Poco PadDifference
Height260.9 mm280 mm−19.1 mm
Width176.8 mm181.9 mm−5.1 mm
Thickness6.9 mm7.5 mm−0.6 mm
Weight499 g571 g−72 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad 11.5 better than Poco Pad?

  1. Weight499 g vs 571 g+14%
  2. Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
  3. Thickness6.9 mm vs 7.5 mm+9%

Why is Poco Pad better than MatePad 11.5?

  1. Battery capacity7,700 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+30%
  2. Wired charging22 W vs 33 W+47%
  3. Screen size11.5″ vs 12.1″+5%
  4. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. Memory card slotNo · MatePad 11.5: Yes
  6. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · MatePad 11.5: Yes
  7. Pixel density229 ppi vs 249 ppi+9%
  8. Resolution (long side)2,200 px vs 2,560 px+16%
  9. Resolution (short side)1,440 px vs 1,600 px+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco PadXiaomi Poco Pad≈ $3007.3
Design
Weight499 g571 g
Thickness6.9 mm7.5 mm
Height260.9 mm280 mm
Width176.8 mm181.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursSpace GrayDark Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size11.5″12.1″
PanelTFT LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,440 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)2,200 px2,560 px
Pixel density229 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—600 nits
Measured brightness—564 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.8%83.4%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
GPUAdreno 644Adreno 710
AnTuTu score—600,399
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—2,909
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—793
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,700 mAh10,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—9.2 h
Wired charging22 W33 W
Charged in 30 min—29%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5G—Yes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth—5.2
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
NFCNoNo
GPSNoNo
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera8 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchHarmony OS 3.1Android 14
PlatformOther (Windows, …)Android
Interface—HyperOS
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare