vs
9.0Display8.6
7.9Performance8.7
8.5Battery7.4
8.1Memory & storage8.1
7.6Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 12 X (2025)Yoga Tab
| MatePad 12 X (2025) | Yoga Tab | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 270 mm | 255.5 mm | +14.5 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 165.8 mm | +17.2 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 8.3 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Weight | 555 g | 458 g | +97 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 12 X (2025) better than Yoga Tab?
- Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 8,860 mAh+14%
- Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
- Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Screen size12″ vs 11.1″+8%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 800 nits+25%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Thickness5.9 mm vs 8.3 mm+41%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.3% vs 84.3%+2%
Why is Yoga Tab better than MatePad 12 X (2025)?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,973 vs 5,672+43%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+32%
- Pixel density279 ppi vs 340 ppi+22%
- Weight555 g vs 458 g+21%
- Energy classG vs F
- Repairability classC vs A
- Front camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 3,200 px+14%
- Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 2,000 px+9%
- Endurance per cycle94 h vs 102 h+8%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 555 g | 458 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 270 mm | 255.5 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | White, Greenery | Luna Grey, Seashell |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 11.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 2,000 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 340 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 897 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 84.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T92B | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 920 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,333,285 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,973 | 5,672 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 8,860 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.3 | Android 15 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 94 h | 102 h |
| Repairability class | C | A |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
