vs
9.0Display8.4
9.0Battery7.8
8.7Memory & storage7.2
6.4Features3.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad Air (2024)iQOO Pad2
| MatePad Air (2024) | iQOO Pad2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 270 mm | 266.4 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 192 mm | −9 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 555 g | 589 g | −34 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad Air (2024) better than iQOO Pad2?
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 600 nits+67%
- Wired charging66 W vs 44 W+50%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Pad2: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Weight555 g vs 589 g+6%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.6 mm+12%
Why is iQOO Pad2 better than MatePad Air (2024)?
- Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,968 px+7%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
- USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 555 g | 589 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6.6 mm |
| Height | 270 mm | 266.4 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 192 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Pink, Green, White, Gray | Gray, Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 12.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 1,968 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 283 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 86.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | — | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 3 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 735 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 14 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | OriginOS 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei MatePad Air (2024)vsWortmann Terra Pad 1201
vs
Honor Pad V9vsHuawei MatePad Air (2024)
8.68.8
vs
OnePlus Pad ProvsHuawei MatePad Air (2024)
9.08.8
vs
Vivo Pad3 ProvsHuawei MatePad Air (2024)
9.38.8
vs
Huawei MatePad Air (2025)vsHuawei MatePad Air (2024)
8.78.8
vs
Huawei MatePad Air (2026)vsHuawei MatePad Air (2024)
9.08.8