vs
8.6Display9.1
8.3Battery9.4
6.7Memory & storage6.1
7.1Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad Air Z EnjoyMoto Pad 70 Pro
| MatePad Air Z Enjoy | Moto Pad 70 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 183.6 mm | 296.5 mm | −112.9 mm |
| Width | 270.5 mm | 191.9 mm | +78.6 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 555 g | 598 g | −43 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad Air Z Enjoy better than Moto Pad 70 Pro?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 800 nits+12%
- Weight555 g vs 598 g+8%
- Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.2 mm+5%
Why is Moto Pad 70 Pro better than MatePad Air Z Enjoy?
- Wired charging40 W vs 68 W+70%
- Screen size12″ vs 13″+8%
- Memory card slotNo · MatePad Air Z Enjoy: Yes
- Pixel density279 ppi vs 318 ppi+14%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 3,504 px+25%
- Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 2,190 px+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 555 g | 598 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6.2 mm |
| Height | 183.6 mm | 296.5 mm |
| Width | 270.5 mm | 191.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Silver, Pink | Pantone Titan |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 13″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 2,190 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 3,504 px |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 318 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 86.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T93SD or Kirin T93S | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 3.21 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 825 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 68 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 6 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | — | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 7.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab Pro G2vsHuawei MatePad Air Z Enjoy
vs
Lenovo ThinkTab X11vsHuawei MatePad Air Z Enjoy
8.48.4
vs
Jumper Z3vsHuawei MatePad Air Z Enjoy
vs
Huawei MatePad Air Z EnjoyvsAcer Iconia V13-11
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab Pro G2vsMotorola Moto Pad 70 Pro
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsMotorola Moto Pad 70 Pro