zh.md
Compare
MatePad Edge vs Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra

Huawei MatePad Edge vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra

What MatePad Edge does better (11) and where Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2025MatePad Edge

9.7Score

11 advantages≈ $790

Higher score

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra

9.2Score

8 advantages≈ $1,300

9.6Display9.4

9.8Battery7.9

9.6Memory & storage9.7

9.1Features9.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad EdgeGalaxy Tab S9 Ultra

	MatePad Edge	Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	Difference
Height	312.1 mm	326.4 mm	−14.3 mm
Width	212 mm	208.6 mm	+3.4 mm
Thickness	6.9 mm	5.5 mm	+1.4 mm
Weight	789 g	732 g	+57 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Edge better than Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra?

RAM32 GB vs 16 GB2×
Wired charging140 W vs 45 W3.1×
Storage (max)2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Battery capacity12,900 mAh vs 11,200 mAh+15%
Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
Front camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
Pixel density264 ppi vs 239 ppi+10%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 930 nits+8%
Resolution (short side)2,080 px vs 1,848 px+13%
Resolution (long side)3,120 px vs 2,960 px+5%

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra better than MatePad Edge?

Cellular (LTE)No · MatePad Edge: Yes
Screen size14.2″ vs 14.6″+3%
Memory card slotNo · MatePad Edge: Yes
eSIMNo · MatePad Edge: Yes
GPSNo · MatePad Edge: Yes
Weight789 g vs 732 g+8%
Thickness6.9 mm vs 5.5 mm+25%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Edge≈ $7909.7	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra≈ $1,3009.2
Design
Weight	789 g	732 g
Thickness	6.9 mm	5.5 mm
Height	312.1 mm	326.4 mm
Width	212 mm	208.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass
Colours	Gray, Silver	Beige, Graphite
Display
Screen size	14.2″	14.6″
Panel	OLED	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (short side)	2,080 px	1,848 px
Resolution (long side)	3,120 px	2,960 px
Pixel density	264 ppi	239 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	930 nits
Measured brightness	—	642 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.7%	90.7%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin X90A	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	—	3.36 GHz
GPU	—	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	—	1,199,328
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	4,835
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,829
Memory
RAM	32 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	2,048 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	12,900 mAh	11,200 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.1 h
Wired charging	140 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	32%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	Yes
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	No	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	No	Yes
Satellite navigation	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-21.2 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Yes	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2
Rear cameras	2	2
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Front camera	32 MP	12 MP
4K front-camera video	No	Yes
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 5.1	Android 13
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	One UI 6
Major OS updates promised	—	4