How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. MatePad Edge vs Pad 6S Pro 12.4

Huawei MatePad Edge vs Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4

What MatePad Edge does better (11) and where Pad 6S Pro 12.4 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Huawei MatePad Edge
Huawei · 2025MatePad Edge
9.7Score
11 advantages≈ $790
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
Xiaomi · 2024Pad 6S Pro 12.4
9.0Score
5 advantages≈ $760
9.6Display9.1
9.8Battery7.8
9.6Memory & storage9.4
9.1Features8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad EdgePad 6S Pro 12.4
212 × 312.16.9191.6 × 278.76.3
MatePad EdgePad 6S Pro 12.4Difference
Height312.1 mm278.7 mm+33.4 mm
Width212 mm191.6 mm+20.4 mm
Thickness6.9 mm6.3 mm+0.6 mm
Weight789 g590 g+199 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Edge better than Pad 6S Pro 12.4?

  1. RAM32 GB vs 16 GB2×
  2. Battery capacity12,900 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+29%
  3. OLED panelYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
  4. Storage (max)2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  5. Screen size14.2″ vs 12.4″+15%
  6. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
  7. Wired charging140 W vs 120 W+17%
  8. Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 900 nits+11%
  9. Screen-to-body ratio90.7% vs 85.7%+6%
  10. Resolution (short side)2,080 px vs 2,032 px+2%
  11. Resolution (long side)3,120 px vs 3,048 px+2%

Why is Pad 6S Pro 12.4 better than MatePad Edge?

  1. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  2. Weight789 g vs 590 g+34%
  3. Pixel density264 ppi vs 295 ppi+12%
  4. Thickness6.9 mm vs 6.3 mm+10%
  5. USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight789 g590 g
Thickness6.9 mm6.3 mm
Height312.1 mm278.7 mm
Width212 mm191.6 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursGray, SilverBlack, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size14.2″12.4″
PanelOLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (short side)2,080 px2,032 px
Resolution (long side)3,120 px3,048 px
Pixel density264 ppi295 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness1,000 nits900 nits
Measured brightness—848 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.7%85.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetKirin X90AQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerKirinQualcomm
Process—4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency—3.2 GHz
GPU—Adreno 740
AnTuTu score—1,539,762
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—5,268
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,970
Memory
RAM32 GB16 GB
Storage (max)2,048 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity12,900 mAh10,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—11.2 h
Wired charging140 W120 W
Charged in 30 min—135%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.3
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.13.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)—Yes
NFCNoYes
GPSNoNo
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-20.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorYesSide / power button
SensorsFingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera50 MP50 MP
Rear camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Rear cameras21
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Front camera32 MP32 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchHarmonyOS 5.1Android 14
PlatformHarmonyOSAndroid
Interface—HyperOS
Major OS updates promised—3
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare