How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. MatePad Pro 11 (2022) vs Axon Pad

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022) vs ZTE Axon Pad

What MatePad Pro 11 (2022) does better (8) and where Axon Pad wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022)
Huawei · 2022MatePad Pro 11 (2022)
8.2Score
8 advantages≈ $540
vs
ZTE Axon Pad
ZTE · 2023Axon Pad
8.9Score
5 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
8.4Display7.9
7.0Performance8.6
7.3Battery8.7
7.2Memory & storage8.7
8.9Features9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 11 (2022)Axon Pad
160.4 × 249.25.9181 × 2796.5
MatePad Pro 11 (2022)Axon PadDifference
Height249.2 mm279 mm−29.8 mm
Width160.4 mm181 mm−20.6 mm
Thickness5.9 mm6.5 mm−0.6 mm
Weight449 g605 g−156 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 11 (2022) better than Axon Pad?

  1. OLED panelYes · Axon Pad: No
  2. Weight449 g vs 605 g+35%
  3. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Axon Pad: No
  4. Max video4K vs 1080p
  5. Pixel density274 ppi vs 249 ppi+10%
  6. CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+7%
  7. Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.5 mm+10%
  8. Screen-to-body ratio87.8% vs 84.1%+4%

Why is Axon Pad better than MatePad Pro 11 (2022)?

  1. Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+20%
  2. Screen size11″ vs 12.1″+10%
  3. Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
  4. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
Specifications

Side by side

ZTE Axon PadZTE Axon Pad≈ $5008.9
Design
Weight449 g605 g
Thickness5.9 mm6.5 mm
Height249.2 mm279 mm
Width160.4 mm181 mm
ColoursGolden Black, Galaxy Blue, Crystal White, Brocade WhiteBlack, Gold
Display
Screen size11″12.1″
PanelOLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (short side)1,600 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)2,560 px2,560 px
Pixel density274 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits—
Measured brightness591 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio87.8%84.1%
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G - GOT-W29Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process7 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.2 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 650 - GOT-W29 Adreno 660 - GOT-W09, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19Adreno 730
AnTuTu score780,161—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,685—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,300 mAh10,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Wired charging66 W80 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesYes
5G—Yes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.1
USB version3.13.1
NFCNoYes
GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-23.5 LUFS—
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/1.8—
Rear cameras21
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate30 fps—
Front camera16 MP16 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchHarmonyOS 3.0Android 13
PlatformHarmonyOSAndroid
Interface—MyOS 13
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare