zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 11 (2024) vs Pad 2

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024) vs OnePlus Pad 2

What MatePad Pro 11 (2024) does better (8) and where Pad 2 wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2023MatePad Pro 11 (2024)

8.1Score

8 advantages≈ $580

OnePlus · 2024Pad 2

8.4Score

12 advantages≈ $590

Higher score

8.7Display9.0

7.9Performance8.6

7.3Battery7.1

7.2Memory & storage6.7

5.8Features7.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 11 (2024)Pad 2

	MatePad Pro 11 (2024)	Pad 2	Difference
Height	249.2 mm	268.7 mm	−19.5 mm
Width	160.4 mm	195.1 mm	−34.7 mm
Thickness	5.9 mm	6.5 mm	−0.6 mm
Weight	449 g	584 g	−135 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 11 (2024) better than Pad 2?

OLED panelYes · Pad 2: No
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Weight449 g vs 584 g+30%
GPSYes · Pad 2: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pad 2: No
Front camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.5 mm+10%
Screen-to-body ratio87.8% vs 84.9%+3%

Why is Pad 2 better than MatePad Pro 11 (2024)?

Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 9,510 mAh+15%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness600 nits vs 900 nits+50%
Screen size11″ vs 12.1″+10%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
CPU frequency2.49 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+33%
Pixel density274 ppi vs 304 ppi+11%
Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 2,120 px+32%
Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 3,000 px+17%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024)≈ $5808.1	OnePlus Pad 2≈ $5908.4
Design
Weight	449 g	584 g
Thickness	5.9 mm	6.5 mm
Height	249.2 mm	268.7 mm
Width	160.4 mm	195.1 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Colours	Gray, Blue, White, Black	Nimbus Gray
Display
Screen size	11″	12.1″
Panel	OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,600 px	2,120 px
Resolution (long side)	2,560 px	3,000 px
Pixel density	274 ppi	304 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	600 nits	900 nits
Measured brightness	—	793 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	87.8%	84.9%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin 9000S	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	7 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.49 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 910 MP4	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	—	1,977,475
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,616
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,699
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	8,300 mAh	9,510 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	10.8 h
Wired charging	66 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	—	64%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-21.8 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Sensors	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2.2
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Front camera	16 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.0	Android 14
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	OxygenOS 16