vs
8.7Display7.9
7.9Performance8.6
7.3Battery8.7
7.2Memory & storage8.7
5.8Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad Pro 11 (2024)Axon Pad
| MatePad Pro 11 (2024) | Axon Pad | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 249.2 mm | 279 mm | −29.8 mm |
| Width | 160.4 mm | 181 mm | −20.6 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 449 g | 605 g | −156 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad Pro 11 (2024) better than Axon Pad?
- OLED panelYes · Axon Pad: No
- Weight449 g vs 605 g+35%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Axon Pad: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Pixel density274 ppi vs 249 ppi+10%
- Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.5 mm+10%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.8% vs 84.1%+4%
Why is Axon Pad better than MatePad Pro 11 (2024)?
- Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+20%
- Cellular (LTE)No · MatePad Pro 11 (2024): Yes
- 5GNo · MatePad Pro 11 (2024): Yes
- Screen size11″ vs 12.1″+10%
- Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
- CPU frequency2.49 GHz vs 3 GHz+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 449 g | 605 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6.5 mm |
| Height | 249.2 mm | 279 mm |
| Width | 160.4 mm | 181 mm |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, White, Black | Black, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 12.1″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 274 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.8% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9000S | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.49 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 MP4 | Adreno 730 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,300 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.0 | Android 13 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | MyOS 13 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9vsHuawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024)
8.68.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+vsHuawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024)
8.08.1
vs
OnePlus PadvsHuawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024)
7.78.1
vs
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024)vsLenovo Legion Y700 (2023)
8.18.0
vs
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024)vsHuawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022)
8.18.2
vs
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2024)vsOukitel RT7 5G
8.17.9