zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 13.2 vs Galaxy Tab S9+

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+

What MatePad Pro 13.2 does better (13) and where Galaxy Tab S9+ wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2023MatePad Pro 13.2

8.6Score

13 advantages≈ $1,100

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9+

9.2Score

8 advantages≈ $1,100

Higher score

9.6Display8.8

6.9Performance8.5

6.9Battery8.4

9.4Memory & storage9.2

8.5Features9.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 13.2Galaxy Tab S9+

	MatePad Pro 13.2	Galaxy Tab S9+	Difference
Height	289.1 mm	285.4 mm	+3.7 mm
Width	196.1 mm	185.4 mm	+10.7 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	5.7 mm	−0.2 mm
Weight	580 g	586 g	−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 13.2 better than Galaxy Tab S9+?

Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Wired charging88 W vs 45 W+96%
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 600 nits+67%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Measured brightness770 nits vs 550 nits+40%
Screen size13.2″ vs 12.4″+6%
Charged in 30 min64% vs 38%+68%
Front camera16 MP vs 12 MP+33%
Resolution (short side)1,920 px vs 1,752 px+10%
Screen-to-body ratio91.5% vs 84.3%+9%
Thickness5.5 mm vs 5.7 mm+4%

Why is Galaxy Tab S9+ better than MatePad Pro 13.2?

AnTuTu score637,351 vs 1,750,9372.7×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,955 vs 5,600+42%
CPU frequency2.62 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+28%
Memory card slotNo · MatePad Pro 13.2: Yes
eSIMNo · MatePad Pro 13.2: Yes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2≈ $1,1008.6	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+≈ $1,1009.2
Design
Weight	580 g	586 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	5.7 mm
Height	289.1 mm	285.4 mm
Width	196.1 mm	185.4 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass
Colours	Black, White, Green	Beige, Graphite
Display
Screen size	13.2″	12.4″
Panel	OLED	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (short side)	1,920 px	1,752 px
Resolution (long side)	2,880 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	262 ppi	266 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	770 nits	550 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	91.5%	84.3%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin 9000S	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	7 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.62 GHz	3.36 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 910 MP4	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	637,351	1,750,937
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,955	5,600
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,890
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	10,090 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	8.2 h	—
Wired charging	88 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	64%	38%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	Yes
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	No	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.2 LUFS	—
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	—	Under display
Sensors	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2
Rear cameras	2	2
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Front camera	16 MP	12 MP
4K front-camera video	No	Yes
Software
OS at launch	Harmony OS 4.0	Android 13
Platform	Other (Windows, …)	Android
Interface	—	One UI 6
Major OS updates promised	—	4