zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro Max vs Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra

Huawei MatePad Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra

What MatePad Pro Max does better (13) and where Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2026MatePad Pro Max

9.4Score

13 advantages≈ $1,250

Higher score

Samsung · 2022Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra

9.2Score

6 advantages≈ $1,250

9.7Display9.0

8.2Battery9.2

9.6Memory & storage8.9

8.5Features9.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro MaxGalaxy Tab S8 Ultra

	MatePad Pro Max	Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	Difference
Height	289.3 mm	326.4 mm	−37.1 mm
Width	196.3 mm	208.6 mm	−12.3 mm
Thickness	4.7 mm	5.5 mm	−0.8 mm
Weight	499 g	726 g	−227 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro Max better than Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra?

Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 600 nits2.7×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
RAM20 GB vs 16 GB+25%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
Weight499 g vs 726 g+45%
Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Pixel density273 ppi vs 240 ppi+14%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Thickness4.7 mm vs 5.5 mm+17%
Bluetooth6 vs 5.2+15%

Why is Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra better than MatePad Pro Max?

Cellular (LTE)No · MatePad Pro Max: Yes
Battery capacity10,400 mAh vs 11,200 mAh+8%
Screen size13.2″ vs 14.6″+11%
Memory card slotNo · MatePad Pro Max: Yes
Ultra-wide cameraNo · MatePad Pro Max: Yes
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro Max≈ $1,2509.4	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra≈ $1,2509.2
Design
Weight	499 g	726 g
Thickness	4.7 mm	5.5 mm
Height	289.3 mm	326.4 mm
Width	196.3 mm	208.6 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Aluminium	—
Ingress protection	IP42	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Blue, Gray	Graphite
Display
Screen size	13.2″	14.6″
Panel	OLED	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (short side)	2,000 px	1,848 px
Resolution (long side)	3,000 px	2,960 px
Pixel density	273 ppi	240 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,600 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	—	600 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	91.4%	90%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T93 Pro	Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	—	8
CPU frequency	—	3 GHz
GPU	—	Adreno 730
AnTuTu score	—	1,288,476
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	4,000
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	2,300
Memory
RAM	20 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,400 mAh	11,200 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Wired charging	66 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	33%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	Yes
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	6	5.2
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	—	Under display
Sensors	Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2
Rear cameras	1	2
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Front camera	12 MP	12 MP
4K front-camera video	No	Yes
Software
OS at launch	Harmony OS 4.3	Android 12
Platform	Other (Windows, …)	Android
Interface	—	One UI 6.1.1
Major OS updates promised	—	4
EU label
Energy class	G	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	72 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	E	—