vs
4.2Display3.8
3.5Performance3.2
2.6Battery5.5
3.3Memory & storage2.8
3.7Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad T 10sT20
| MatePad T 10s | T20 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 240.2 mm | 247.6 mm | −7.4 mm |
| Width | 159 mm | 157.5 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 450 g | 465 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad T 10s better than T20?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+11%
- Weight450 g vs 465 g+3%
Why is T20 better than MatePad T 10s?
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 8,200 mAh+61%
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- Front camera2 MP vs 5 MP2.5×
- Screen size10.1″ vs 10.4″+3%
- Storage (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Rear camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Process14 nm vs 12 nm+17%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,000 px+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 465 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 240.2 mm | 247.6 mm |
| Width | 159 mm | 157.5 mm |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | — | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Colours | Gold, Deepsea Blue | Deep Ocean |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 10.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 224 ppi | 224 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 422 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77.4% | 78.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 710A | Unisoc T610 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Unisoc |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 8,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 10.1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei MatePad T 10svsLenovo Tab M10 HD Gen 2
4.44.3
vs
Huawei MatePad T 10svsLenovo M10 Plus
4.44.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.4 (2020)vsHuawei MatePad T 10s
3.84.4
vs
Huawei MatePad T 10svsLenovo M10 FHD REL
4.44.3
vs
Honor Pad 6vsHuawei MatePad T 10s
4.34.4
vs
Huawei MatePad T 10svsHuawei Enjoy Tablet 2
4.44.4