How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
637 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Xpad 30E vs MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2

Infinix Xpad 30E vs Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2

What Xpad 30E does better (5) and where MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Infinix Xpad 30E
Infinix · 2026Xpad 30E
5.7Score
5 advantages≈ $270
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2
Xoro · 2026MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2
5.8Score
1 advantage≈ $260
Higher score
4.6Display6.2
6.1Memory & storage4.4

Why is Xpad 30E better than MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2?

  1. Weight498 g vs 1,300 g2.6×
  2. Peak brightness440 nits vs 220 nits2×
  3. Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  4. Cellular (LTE)Yes · MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2: No
  5. RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%

Why is MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2 better than Xpad 30E?

  1. Screen size11″ vs 13.3″+21%
Specifications

Side by side

Infinix Xpad 30EInfinix Xpad 30E≈ $2705.7
Design
Weight498 g1,300 g
Thickness7.9 mm—
Height257.7 mm13 mm
Width169.2 mm—
Ingress protection—IP44
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
ColoursDeep Blue, Dreamy Purple, Forest Green—
Display
Screen size11″13.3″
PanelIPS LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px—
Resolution (long side)1,920 px—
Pixel density206 ppi—
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Peak brightness440 nits220 nits
Screen-to-body ratio80.5%—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80ARM Cortex
Chip makerMediaTekARM
Process12 nm—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency2 GHz—
GPUMali-G52 MC2—
Memory
RAM8 GB6 GB
Storage (max)256 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Memory card slotYes—
Battery
Battery capacity7,200 mAh—
Wired charging10 W—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
eSIMNo—
Dual SIMNo—
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5—
Bluetooth5.25.1
USBUSB Type-C 2.0—
USB version2—
NFCNo—
GPSYes—
Features
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5 mm headphone jackYes—
SensorsAccelerometer—
Cameras
Rear camera8 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Max video1080p—
Front camera5 MP—
4K front-camera videoNo—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15—
PlatformAndroid—
EU label
Energy class—G
Battery charge cycles—800
Endurance per cycle—95 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—E
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare