How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Xpad GT vs Poco Pad M1

Infinix Xpad GT vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

What Xpad GT does better (13) and where Poco Pad M1 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Infinix Xpad GT
Infinix · 2025Xpad GT
8.0Score
13 advantages≈ $380
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad M1
7.8Score
6 advantages
8.4Display7.6
7.9Performance5.7
7.4Battery9.1
6.8Memory & storage7.6
5.9Features5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Xpad GTPoco Pad M1
191.1 × 291.76.5181.7 × 279.87.5
Xpad GTPoco Pad M1Difference
Height291.7 mm279.8 mm+11.9 mm
Width191.1 mm181.7 mm+9.4 mm
Thickness6.5 mm7.5 mm−1 mm
Weight655 g610 g+45 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Xpad GT better than Poco Pad M1?

  1. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  2. Screen size13″ vs 12.1″+7%
  3. GPSYes · Poco Pad M1: No
  4. Peak brightness700 nits vs 600 nits+17%
  5. Pixel density263 ppi vs 249 ppi+6%
  6. CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+5%
  7. Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
  8. Loudspeaker loudness-20.7 LUFS vs -24.5 LUFS+-16%
  9. Thickness6.5 mm vs 7.5 mm+15%
  10. Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,600 px+15%
  11. Resolution (long side)2,880 px vs 2,560 px+12%
  12. Front camera9 MP vs 8 MP+12%

Why is Poco Pad M1 better than Xpad GT?

  1. Battery capacity10,000 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+20%
  2. Active use (test)11.4 h vs 14.8 h+30%
  3. Memory card slotNo · Xpad GT: Yes
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Xpad GT: Yes
  5. Weight655 g vs 610 g+7%
  6. Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Infinix Xpad GTInfinix Xpad GT≈ $3808.0
Design
Weight655 g610 g
Thickness6.5 mm7.5 mm
Height291.7 mm279.8 mm
Width191.1 mm181.7 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3—
ColoursStellar GrayGray, Blue
Display
Screen size13″12.1″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,840 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)2,880 px2,560 px
Pixel density263 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness700 nits600 nits
Measured brightness—581 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.7%83.5%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5GQualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process5 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.84 GHz2.7 GHz
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 810
AnTuTu score—817,549
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—1,244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,103
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity10,000 mAh12,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)11.4 h14.8 h
Wired charging33 W33 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.4
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-20.7 LUFS-24.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera9 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceXOS 15HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class—G
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—103 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare