How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. IdeaTab 2025 vs Redmi Pad

Lenovo IdeaTab 2025 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad

What IdeaTab 2025 does better (2) and where Redmi Pad wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Lenovo IdeaTab 2025
Lenovo · 2025IdeaTab 2025
2 advantages≈ $180
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi · 2022Redmi Pad
5.1Score
1 advantage≈ $270
Higher score
6.5Display4.9

Why is IdeaTab 2025 better than Redmi Pad?

  1. Screen size11″ vs 10.6″+4%
  2. Peak brightness500 nits vs 400 nits+25%

Why is Redmi Pad better than IdeaTab 2025?

  1. Weight480 g vs 465 g+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Redmi PadXiaomi Redmi Pad≈ $2705.1
Design
Weight480 g465 g
Thickness—7.1 mm
Height7 mm250.5 mm
Width—158.1 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Ingress protectionIP52—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2—
Colours—Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green
Display
Screen size11″10.6″
Panel—IPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)—1,200 px
Resolution (long side)—2,000 px
Pixel density—220 ppi
Refresh rate—90 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits400 nits
Measured brightness—402 nits
Screen-to-body ratio—80.9%
Performance
ChipsetMediaTekMediatek Helio G99
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process—6 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—2.2 GHz
GPU—Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score—319,077
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—1,852
Memory
RAM—6 GB
Storage (max)—128 GB
Storage (base)—64 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slot—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity—8,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Wired charging—18 W
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5G—No
eSIM—No
Dual SIM—No
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.2
USB—USB Type-C
NFC—No
GPS—No
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack—No
Sensors—Accelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera—8 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Max video—1080p
Front camera—8 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launch—Android 12
Platform—Android
Interface—MIUI 14
EU label
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle94 h—
Repairability classA—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare