vs
6.8Display3.0
Why is IdeaTab Pro better than Pad 70 WiFi?
- Screen size12.7″ vs 10.1″+26%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Pad 70 WiFi better than IdeaTab Pro?
- Weight620 g vs 520 g+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 620 g | 520 g |
| Thickness | — | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 7 mm | 246.5 mm |
| Width | — | 163 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Asahi glass |
| Colours | — | Grey, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.7″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | — | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | — | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 73.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek | Rockchip RK3562 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| CPU cores | — | 4 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G52 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 6,580 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| NFC | — | No |
| GPS | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 720p |
| Front camera | — | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 14 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 112 h | — |
| Repairability class | A | — |
| Drop resistance class | E | — |
