vs
3.7Display5.8
3.8Performance3.1
3.0Battery5.0
3.6Memory & storage5.2
3.4Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto Pad 60 LiteBlack Shark Pad 7
| Moto Pad 60 Lite | Black Shark Pad 7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 235.7 mm | 254.6 mm | −18.9 mm |
| Width | 154.5 mm | 166.1 mm | −11.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.3 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 425 g | 505 g | −80 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto Pad 60 Lite better than Black Shark Pad 7?
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Weight425 g vs 505 g+19%
- Pixel density224 ppi vs 204 ppi+10%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Black Shark Pad 7 better than Moto Pad 60 Lite?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 7,700 mAh+51%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Screen size10.1″ vs 11″+9%
- Memory card slotNo · Moto Pad 60 Lite: Yes
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 420 nits+5%
- Rear camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 7.3 mm+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.2% vs 83%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 425 g | 505 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 235.7 mm | 254.6 mm |
| Width | 154.5 mm | 166.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Pantone Sky Gray | Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,900 px |
| Pixel density | 224 ppi | 204 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 420 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.2% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 | Mediatek Helio G88 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 339,004 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,360 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 7,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2.0 |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab 2025vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Lite
vs
Acer Iconia Tab A11-21vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Lite
vs
Lenovo Tab K11 G2vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Lite
vs
Honor Pad X7vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Lite
4.74.5
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab 2025vsXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7
vs
Acer Iconia Tab A11-21vsXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7