vs
7.0Display6.7
7.2Performance4.8
4.3Battery4.9
5.2Memory & storage3.8
5.9Features3.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto Pad 60 NeoRedmi Pad 2 9.7
| Moto Pad 60 Neo | Redmi Pad 2 9.7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254.6 mm | 226.5 mm | +28.1 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 148 mm | +18.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 480 g | 406 g | +74 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto Pad 60 Neo better than Redmi Pad 2 9.7?
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Redmi Pad 2 9.7: No
- 5GYes · Redmi Pad 2 9.7: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Screen size11″ vs 9.7″+13%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- GPSYes · Redmi Pad 2 9.7: No
- Wired charging20 W vs 18 W+11%
- Pixel density274 ppi vs 268 ppi+2%
- Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 1,280 px+25%
- Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 2,048 px+25%
- Thickness7 mm vs 7.4 mm+6%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Redmi Pad 2 9.7 better than Moto Pad 60 Neo?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity7,040 mAh vs 7,600 mAh+8%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz+21%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
- Weight480 g vs 406 g+18%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.9% vs 87.9%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 406 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 254.6 mm | 226.5 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 148 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Bronze Green, Malibu Blue | Graphite Gray, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 9.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 2,048 px |
| Pixel density | 274 ppi | 268 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 416 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 87.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 560,711 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,549 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,040 mAh | 7,600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | E |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 108 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab 2025vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
vs
Lenovo Tab K11 G2vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
vs
Blackview Zeno 10vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
6.66.5
vs
Acer Iconia Tab A12-11vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab 2025vsXiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.65.4